Suggestions

CTSH · NASDAQ

COGNIZANT TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS CORP

Private beta

Sector unavailable · Industry unavailable

$60.00

+2.88%

Close on Sep 11, 2026

Watch

Updated 6/30/2026

Long-term research evidence only. No price targets, no trading signals, no recommendations.

Investment Report Card

COGNIZANT TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS CORP

Sector unavailable · Data confidence good

37 / 100

Rank #531 of 1,152 qualified companies

Top 77% · Not Currently Suggested

Risk Intelligence

Core Model
C

60 / 100

Restricted

How strong and defensively sound is the company?

Around the middle of the covered universe.

Long-Term Potential

Research Model
C−

59 / 100

Not Scored

Does the business have the characteristics needed to create value over many years?

Around the middle of the covered universe.

Fundamental Momentum

Research Model
F

33 / 100

Not Scored

Is the underlying business getting stronger or weaker?

Weaker than most covered companies on this measure.

Ownership Intelligence

Supplemental Intelligence
C−

60 / 100

Positive disclosed activity

What are important owners actually doing?

Around the middle of the covered universe.

Valuation Intelligence

Research Model
B

77 / 100

Very Attractive

Is today's price reasonable?

Above average on this measure — and valuation is researched separately from the Suggested Investment Score.

Capital Returns Intelligence

Research Model
B−

72 / 100

Strong Capital Returns

How effectively does the company reward shareholders?

Above average on this measure — and capital returns are researched separately from the Suggested Investment Score.

Why it stands out

  • More disclosed holders are new or increasing than reducing or exiting.
  • Attractive valuation: the stock reads 77 out of 100 on Valuation Intelligence (Very Attractive) relative to its own history and comparable companies.

What holds it back

No weakening evidence is recorded in today's readings.

Long-term view

COGNIZANT TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS CORP scores 59 on Long-Term Potential (C−), described by the research model as not scored. This describes business characteristics only — it is not a forecast of future returns.

Ownership view

Disclosed ownership evidence reads 60 (C−): Positive disclosed activity. 5 tracked managers disclosed a position in the latest reporting period. Ownership filings are historical disclosures, not signals.

Valuation view

COGNIZANT TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS CORP reads 77 out of 100 on Valuation Intelligence, recorded as Very Attractive. The stock currently trades below most of its own recent valuation history and below comparable companies. This describes the price being paid relative to the company's financials — it is not a forecast and not a fair value. Valuation Intelligence is a research model and contributes nothing to the Suggested Investment Score or the daily ranking.

Capital returns view

COGNIZANT TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS CORP reads 72 out of 100 on Capital Returns Intelligence (Strong Capital Returns), reflecting a dividend that has grown about 13.5% a year and a share count falling about 2.5% a year. Capital Returns Intelligence is a research model and contributes nothing to the Suggested Investment Score or the daily ranking.

What changed

No meaningful recorded changes in the stored history.

Risk Intelligence is a core model, Long-Term Potential, Fundamental Momentum, Valuation Intelligence and Capital Returns Intelligence are research models, and Ownership Intelligence is supplemental descriptive evidence. Valuation Intelligence and Capital Returns Intelligence each contribute 0% to the Suggested Investment Score. Nothing here is a recommendation.

Compare CTSH with other companies

Appears in

Rule-based membership

Membership means the company satisfied a published rule on the latest research build. It is not a recommendation.

About a minute to read

The 60-Second Investment Brief

Written from stored research readings only. No hype. No trading signals. Just better evidence.

Why it's interesting

COGNIZANT TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS CORP (CTSH) scores 37 out of 100 and ranks #531 of 1,152 qualified companies today. That places it in the top 77% of ranked companies. The stored tier for that score is not currently suggested.

Business strength

Risk Intelligence reads 60 out of 100 (C), recorded as restricted. Around the middle of the covered universe.

Long-term opportunity

Long-Term Potential reads 59 out of 100 (C−), recorded as not scored. Around the middle of the covered universe.

What's improving or weakening

Fundamental Momentum reads 33 out of 100 (F), recorded as not scored. Weaker than most covered companies on this measure.

What important owners are doing

Ownership Intelligence reads 60 out of 100 (C−), recorded as positive disclosed activity. Around the middle of the covered universe.

What kind of price you'd be paying

Valuation currently appears favourable: Valuation Intelligence reads 77 out of 100 (B), recorded as Very Attractive. COGNIZANT TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS CORP reads 77 out of 100 on Valuation Intelligence, recorded as Very Attractive. The stock currently trades below most of its own recent valuation history and below comparable companies. This describes the price being paid relative to the company's financials — it is not a forecast and not a fair value. Valuation Intelligence is a research model and contributes nothing to the Suggested Investment Score or the daily ranking.

How the company rewards shareholders

Capital Returns Intelligence reads 72 out of 100 (B−), recorded as Strong Capital Returns. COGNIZANT TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS CORP reads 72 out of 100 on Capital Returns Intelligence (Strong Capital Returns), reflecting a dividend that has grown about 13.5% a year and a share count falling about 2.5% a year. Capital Returns Intelligence is a research model and contributes nothing to the Suggested Investment Score or the daily ranking.

What could go wrong

No weakening factors are recorded in today's stored readings, and data confidence is good. Absence of a recorded weakness is not evidence of safety.

Bottom line

No individual layer reaches the strongest band today. Long-Term Potential and Fundamental Momentum and Ownership Intelligence remain the main area to watch. Separately from the score, valuation reads very attractive at today's price.

Composite discovery model

Suggested Investment Score

Suggested Investment Score

37 / 100

Not Currently Suggested

A 0–100 composite discovery score combining Risk Intelligence, Long-Term Potential, Fundamental Momentum, and Ownership Intelligence. It helps rank qualified companies for further research and does not predict future returns.

Rank
#531 of 694
Percentile
Top 77%
Ranking updated
September 12, 2026
302Rank weakened by 302 positions. Rank weakened by 302 positions.
Risk Intelligence
60

30% contribution

Long-Term Potential
59

30% contribution

Fundamental Momentum
33

20% contribution

Ownership Intelligence
60

20% contribution

Ownership Intelligence

60 / 100 · Moderately Positive · 20% of the Suggested Investment Score

SUPPLEMENTAL / DESCRIPTIVE INTELLIGENCE

Coverage: Good

Elite Investor Activity
50 · Moderately Positive

50% of Ownership Intelligence · 10% of the total score

Tracked professional-manager activity is moderately positive.

Institutional Activity
84 · Strong

20% of Ownership Intelligence · 4% of the total score

Broad institutional evidence from resolved filings is strong.

Insider Activity
Insufficient Data

15% of Ownership Intelligence · 3% of the total score

No discretionary insider transactions are stored for this company, so this evidence is unavailable rather than neutral.

Strategic Ownership
Insufficient Data

15% of Ownership Intelligence · 3% of the total score

No qualifying major-holder filings are stored, so this evidence is unavailable rather than neutral.

Ownership Intelligence summarizes publicly disclosed activity among professional investment managers, broader institutions, company insiders, and significant strategic owners. It adds context to investment research but is not a validated predictor of future performance. Ownership information is publicly reported with a delay; the latest applicable reporting period is 2026-06-30, publicly disclosed 9/11/2026. Congressional activity is unavailable pending legal review and contributes nothing to this reading.

Why it ranks here

No component ranks in the top quartile of the qualified universe.

What holds it back

  • Risk Intelligence is less favourable

    Defensive characteristics rank below the middle of the qualified universe.

  • Fundamental Momentum is softer

    Reported business trends rank below the qualified median.

  • Ownership evidence is not uniformly supportive

    The combined disclosed ownership evidence ranks below the qualified median.

  • Ownership evidence disagrees

    Different owner groups point in different directions, so the combined reading is best read as mixed rather than uniformly favourable.

COMPOSITE DISCOVERY MODEL — RESEARCH STAGE · Data coverage Excellent. Rankings are recalculated daily using the latest available information. Individual components may update at different frequencies based on when new financial and ownership data becomes available.

Researched separately

Valuation Intelligence 77 · Very Attractive

RESEARCH MODEL

Valuation Intelligence is currently researched separately and does not affect the Suggested Investment Score or daily ranking.

Researched separately

Capital Returns Intelligence 72 · Strong Capital Returns

RESEARCH MODEL

Capital Returns Intelligence is researched separately and contributes 0% to the Suggested Investment Score, the daily rank or any ranking event.

Score explanation

Why this company scores the way it does

Four research areas carry fixed weights. Each area is compared against every other eligible company, then weighted. The four contributions below add to 36.6 of the stored score (36.6).

  • Risk Intelligence

    30% of the score · contributes 9.6 points

    How strong and defensively sound is the company?

    Stands at the 32 percentile of eligible companies · stored reading 60 · 26% of this company’s total score

    How financially sturdy the company has been when conditions turned against it.

    How this area is measured

    Risk Intelligence reads stored balance-sheet strength, historical downside behaviour and the company's price-risk grouping. A stronger reading describes past resilience; it does not protect against future losses.

    Full methodology
  • Long-Term Potential

    30% of the score · contributes 19.1 points

    Does the business have the characteristics needed to create value over many years?

    Stands at the 64 percentile of eligible companies · stored reading 59 · 52% of this company’s total score

    Whether the business has the durable characteristics long-term owners look for.

    How this area is measured

    Long-Term Potential reads durability characteristics such as profitability consistency, cash generation and reinvestment capability over multiple reported periods.

    Full methodology
  • Fundamental Momentum

    20% of the score · contributes 3.4 points

    Is the underlying business getting stronger or weaker?

    Stands at the 17 percentile of eligible companies · stored reading 33 · 9% of this company’s total score

    Whether the reported business results have been getting stronger or weaker.

    How this area is measured

    Fundamental Momentum compares recent reported fundamentals with the company's own earlier periods, so improvement or deterioration is measured against its history rather than against a forecast.

    Full methodology
  • Ownership Intelligence

    20% of the score · contributes 4.5 points

    What are important owners actually doing?

    Stands at the 23 percentile of eligible companies · stored reading 60 · 12% of this company’s total score

    What large reporting owners have actually been doing with their positions.

    How this area is measured

    Ownership Intelligence reads public ownership filings: how many tracked reporting owners hold the company, and whether they were adding, holding, reducing or exiting in the latest disclosed period.

    Full methodology

What is helping the score

  • Long-Term Potential64 percentile, adding 19.1 points.

What deserves attention

  • Fundamental Momentum17 percentile, adding only 3.4 of a possible 20 points.
  • Ownership Intelligence23 percentile, adding only 4.5 of a possible 20 points.
  • Risk Intelligence32 percentile, adding only 9.6 of a possible 30 points.
Outside the score

Additional research — not currently included in the primary Suggested Investment Score.

  • Valuation IntelligenceCOGNIZANT TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS CORP reads 77 out of 100 on Valuation Intelligence, recorded as Very Attractive. The stock currently trades below most of its own recent valuation history and below comparable companies. This describes the price being paid relative to the company's financials — it is not a forecast and not a fair value.
  • Capital Returns IntelligenceCOGNIZANT TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS CORP reads 72 out of 100 on Capital Returns Intelligence (Strong Capital Returns), reflecting a dividend that has grown about 13.5% a year and a share count falling about 2.5% a year.

Stored snapshots only

What changed

Research-score history available since September 2026.

Stored research history does not yet cover a full 30 days comparison for this company.

A change is reported as meaningful at 8 score points, 5 rank places, or any change of research classification. Nothing here is a recommendation to buy or sell.

Learn the metrics on this page

Plain-English definitions, with the formula and the limitations of each measure.

Fifth research lens · outside the score

Valuation Intelligence

Valuation Intelligence

Is today's price reasonable?

Valuation Intelligence is currently researched separately and does not affect the Suggested Investment Score or daily ranking.

77/ 100

Very Attractive

RESEARCH MODEL
Excellent coverage

Compared with its history

97

Very Attractive

Is this company expensive or inexpensive compared with its own history?

Compared with peers

58

Reasonable

How expensive is this stock compared with similar companies?

Earnings & cash flow

80

Very Attractive

How much financial output does an investor receive relative to the price paid?

Growth-adjusted

67

Attractive

Does the company's growth help justify the valuation investors are paying?

COGNIZANT TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS CORP reads 77 out of 100 on Valuation Intelligence, recorded as Very Attractive. The stock currently trades below most of its own recent valuation history and below comparable companies. This describes the price being paid relative to the company's financials — it is not a forecast and not a fair value.

Price data through September 11, 2026 · Financial data through the quarter ended June 30, 2026

Valuation history

Stored readings only. The dashed line is this company's own median for the selected measure.

Only one stored valuation reading exists so far, so there is nothing to chart yet. Valuation history builds forward from activation rather than being reconstructed.

Current P/E 12.2x · own median 18.0x · peer median 15.5x

Valuation is inherently uncertain. A stock that appears inexpensive can continue falling, and a stock that appears expensive can continue rising. Valuation Intelligence provides context about the price investors are paying — it does not predict short-term market movements, and it never produces a fair value, a price target or a buy or sell range. Model VALUATION_INTELLIGENCE_V1.

Sixth research lens · outside the score

Capital Returns Intelligence

Capital Returns Intelligence

How effectively does the company reward shareholders?

Capital Returns Intelligence is researched separately and contributes 0% to the Suggested Investment Score, the daily rank or any ranking event.

72/ 100

Strong Capital Returns

RESEARCH MODEL
Excellent coverage

Dividend Quality

94

Exceptional Capital Returns

Dividend reliability

Buyback Effectiveness

91

Exceptional Capital Returns

Do buybacks actually reduce shares?

Dilution Control

74

Strong Capital Returns

Is your ownership share protected?

Capital Return Sustainability

14

Limited Capital Returns

Can the cash flow support it?

Shareholder Yield

76

Strong Capital Returns

Cash returned versus company value

COGNIZANT TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS CORP reads 72 out of 100 on Capital Returns Intelligence (Strong Capital Returns), reflecting a dividend that has grown about 13.5% a year and a share count falling about 2.5% a year.

Distributions coincided with rising debt over this period, so part of the cash returned was not funded by the cash the business generated.

How returned cash was used

Dividends $618.00M · net repurchases $2.35B · total returned $2.97B · 114% of free cash flow

Price data through September 11, 2026 · Financial data through the quarter ended June 30, 2026

Capital returns history

Stored readings only. History builds forward from activation rather than being reconstructed.

Only one stored reading exists for this measure so far, so there is nothing to chart yet.

Why higher yield isn't always better

A very high dividend yield may reflect a falling share price or an unsustainable payout. Capital Returns Intelligence emphasizes consistency and sustainability rather than simply rewarding the highest yield.

Why buybacks can be misleading

Announced or gross buyback spending does not always mean shareholders are gaining ownership. Companies can simultaneously issue shares through employee compensation or acquisitions. Suggested Investments therefore considers actual share-count changes alongside repurchase spending.

What these terms mean
Dividend Yield
The annual dividend relative to the current share price.
Payout Ratio
The share of company earnings used to pay dividends.
Free Cash Flow Payout
How much of the company's available cash is being used for dividends.
Share Repurchases
When a company buys back its own stock.
Dilution
When the number of shares increases, reducing each existing share's percentage ownership of the company.
Shareholder Yield
A combined view of dividends and net share repurchases relative to the company's market value.

Capital Returns Intelligence describes how a company returns capital to shareholders. It is not a measure of stock-price performance, it does not predict future returns, and a strong reading is never a recommendation to buy. Dividends and repurchases can be reduced or stopped at any time. Model CAPITAL_RETURNS_INTELLIGENCE_V1, contributing 0% to the Suggested Investment Score.

Stored daily snapshots only

Ranking history

Stored Suggested Investment ranking history
Today#531Score 37
30 days agoNot rankedNo stored score
90 days agoNot rankedNo stored score
First suggestedNot yet suggested
Highest rank#531

In the company’s own words

What this company does

Competition ." We compete on the basis of reputation and experience, strategic advisory capabilities, digital and AI capabilities, performance and reliability, responsiveness to customer needs, financial stability, corporate governance and competitive pricing of services. The less we are able to differentiate our services and solutions and/or clearly convey the value of our services and solutions, the more difficulty we have in winning new work in sufficient volumes and at our target pricing and overall economics. In addition to large, global competitors, we face competition in many geographic markets from numerous smaller, local competitors that may have more experience with operations in these markets, have well-established relationships with our desired clients, or be able to provide services and solutions at lower costs or on terms more attractive to clients than we can. Additionally, we face competition from clients' in-house technology resources, such as GCCs, which may provide a lower cost alternative to our services. Consolidation activity may also result in new competitors with greater scale, a broader footprint or vertical integration that makes them more attractive to clients as a single provider of integrated products and services. In addition, concurrent use by many clients of multiple professional service providers means that we are required to be continually competitive on the quality, scope and pricing of our offerings or face a reduction or elimination of our business. Competitors may also be willing, at times, to take on more risk or price contracts lower than us in an effort to enter the market or increase market share. If we are not able to supply clients with services that they deem superior and successfully apply current business models with market level pricing while managing discounts, we may lose business to competitors and face downward pressure on gross margins and profitability. Any inability to compete effectively would materially adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Our relationships with our third-party alliance partners, who supply us with technology, including platforms and software, are also critical to our ability to provide many of our services and solutions that address client demands or requirements. There can be no assurance that we will be able to maintain such relationships or that such technology will be available on the expected timelines or for the anticipated prices. Among other things, such alliance partners may in the future decide to compete with us, form exclusive or more favorable arrangements with our competitors or otherwise reduce our access to their technology, thereby impairing our ability to provide the services and solutions dependent on such technology demanded or required by clients. In addition, some of our third-party alliance partners are also our clients or suppliers of technology for our internal operations. Any performance failure on the part of our alliance partners, or the discontinuance by such alliance partners of technology that we have relied on them to provide for our clients or ourselves, could delay or prevent our performance unless we engage alternative third parties to provide the equivalent technology at our cost or provide the equivalent technology ourselves, any of which could deprive us of potential revenue or adversely impact our profitability. In addition, our third-party alliance partners may also experience reduced demand for their technology, including as a result of changes in technology, which could reduce demand for our services and solutions.

Our competitiveness also depends on our ability to continue to develop and implement services and solutions that anticipate and respond to rapid and continuing changes in technology to serve the evolving needs of our clients. Examples include digital-, cloud- and security-related offerings, AI, augmented reality, automation, blockchain, IoT, quantum and edge computing, digital engineering and manufacturing and as-a-service solutions, among others, which are continually evolving. If we do not sufficiently invest in new technologies, successfully adapt to industry developments and changing demand, develop new tools and platforms that meet our clients' productivity expectations and evolve and expand our business at sufficient speed and scale to keep pace with the demands of the markets we serve, we may be unable to develop and maintain a competitive advantage and execute on our growth strategy, which would materially adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition. Some of these technological changes have reduced or replaced the demand for some of our historical services and solutions and will continue to do so in the future. In addition, our clients may delay spending under existing contracts and engagements or delay entering into new contracts while evaluating new technologies. Such reductions, replacements and delays can negatively impact our results of operations if we are unable to adapt our pricing or the pace and level of spending on new technologies is not sufficient to make up any shortfall. Further, as we expand into these areas, we may be exposed to operational, legal, regulatory, ethical, technological and other risks specific to such new areas, which may negatively affect our reputation and demand for our services and solutions.

Our use of AI technologies may not be successful and may present business, financial, legal and reputational risks.

Quoted from the business section of this company’s 10-K filed February 12, 2026. Read the filing

Four distinct intelligence areas

The IA view

Risk Intelligence

Production core

60

Fundamentally Qualified

+25.3 vs Jun 30, 2026

Business Quality qualification score from the locked IA Defensive Research Core. Price Risk stays a separate category and is never blended in.

As of Sep 11, 2026

Long-Term Potential

Research model

59

Elite Compounder

No prior period to compare

Durable business economics and reinvestment characteristics. Independent external validation is pending.

As of Sep 11, 2026

Fundamental Momentum

Research model

33

Deteriorating

No prior period to compare

Direction and breadth of change in underlying business fundamentals. Not a price-momentum signal.

As of Sep 11, 2026

Elite Investor Activity

Supplemental

50

Mid range

0 vs Jun 30, 2026

Only 5 tracked managers disclosed a position — treat as limited coverage.

As of Sep 11, 2026

Company intelligence

CTSH score history

Each area is measured and reported separately. No combined score exists.

CTSH intelligence history from 2023-09-30 to 2026-09-11. Risk Intelligence 60 on 2026-09-11, up 25.3 from 34.7 on 2026-06-30. Long-Term Potential 59 on 2026-09-11. Fundamental Momentum 32.6 on 2026-09-11. Elite Investor Activity 50 on 2026-09-11, unchanged 0 from 50 on 2026-06-30. Each area is reported separately and is never combined into a single score.

Risk Intelligence 60 as of Sep 11, 2026 (+25.3 vs prior period) · Production core

Long-Term Potential 59 as of Sep 11, 2026 · Research model

Fundamental Momentum 32.6 as of Sep 11, 2026 · Research model

Elite Investor Activity 50 as of Sep 11, 2026 (0 vs prior period) · Supplemental

Share price

CTSH price history

Closing prices adjusted for splits and dividends, through Sep 11, 2026. Past prices do not indicate future results.

6M change
-0.7%
1Y change
-13.1%
3Y change
-10.5%
5Y change
-14.9%
Max change
+8.0%

Last stored close $60.00 · -13.1% over the selected range · 52 sessions shown

Balanced evidence

Why IA likes it

  • More disclosed holders are new or increasing than reducing or exiting.

Risk and uncertainty

What IA doesn’t like

  • No specific negative evidence is available. This is not evidence of low risk.

What would change our view

  • Business Quality falling below the frozen qualification threshold.
  • Price Risk moving to a less favorable category.
  • A sustained reversal in the Fundamental Momentum research evidence.
  • New material public ownership disclosures.

Public filings · descriptive only

Elite Investor Activity

Reporting holders

1

New holders

1

Increasing

0

Reducing

0

Exiting

0

Coverage

Excellent

Positive disclosed activity · Report period 2016-12-31 · Public 12/22/2023

ManagerChangePortfolio weightRankDisclosed

Insufficient high-confidence manager coverage.

Objective stored changes

What changed

  • Risk Intelligence

    IA Defensive weakened

    Business Quality qualification score moved from 39.7 to 34.7.

  • Elite Investor Activity

    Elite Investor Consensus strengthened

    Disclosed agreement among tracked managers moved from 38 to 50 for the reporting period ending 2026-06-30.

  • Elite Investor Activity

    Elite Investor Consensus weakened

    Disclosed agreement among tracked managers moved from 75 to 38 for the reporting period ending 2026-03-31.

  • Elite Investor Activity

    Elite Investor Consensus strengthened

    Disclosed agreement among tracked managers moved from 20 to 75 for the reporting period ending 2025-12-31.

  • Elite Investor Activity

    Elite Investor Consensus weakened

    Disclosed agreement among tracked managers moved from 50 to 20 for the reporting period ending 2025-09-30.

  • Elite Investor Activity

    Elite Investor Consensus strengthened

    Disclosed agreement among tracked managers moved from 13 to 50 for the reporting period ending 2025-06-30.

  • Elite Investor Activity

    Elite Investor Consensus weakened

    Disclosed agreement among tracked managers moved from 63 to 13 for the reporting period ending 2025-03-31.

  • Elite Investor Activity

    Elite Investor Consensus weakened

    Disclosed agreement among tracked managers moved from 100 to 63 for the reporting period ending 2024-12-31.

  • Elite Investor Activity

    Tracked managers initiated positions

    4 tracked managers first disclosed a position for the reporting period ending 2024-09-30.

Ownership timeline

No high-confidence public ownership events are available.

General research only. Not personalized advice. Public filings may be delayed, amended, incomplete, or reflect positions that have changed since the reporting date.