Suggestions

SNA · NYSE

SNAP-ON INC

Private beta

Sector unavailable · Industry unavailable

$375.44

+0.16%

Close on Sep 11, 2026

Defensively Qualified

Updated 6/30/2026

Long-term research evidence only. No price targets, no trading signals, no recommendations.

Investment Report Card

SNAP-ON INC

Sector unavailable · Data confidence good

54 / 100

Rank #294 of 1,152 qualified companies

Top 43% · Not Currently Suggested

Risk Intelligence

Core Model
C+

67 / 100

Fundamentally Qualified

How strong and defensively sound is the company?

Around the middle of the covered universe.

Long-Term Potential

Research Model
C

63 / 100

Ordinary Compounder

Does the business have the characteristics needed to create value over many years?

Around the middle of the covered universe.

Fundamental Momentum

Research Model
C−

55 / 100

Middle

Is the underlying business getting stronger or weaker?

Around the middle of the covered universe.

Ownership Intelligence

Supplemental Intelligence
D

47 / 100

Positive disclosed activity

What are important owners actually doing?

Weaker than most covered companies on this measure.

Valuation Intelligence

Research Model
F

33 / 100

Expensive

Is today's price reasonable?

Weaker than most covered companies on this measure — and valuation is researched separately from the Suggested Investment Score.

Capital Returns Intelligence

Research Model
C+

69 / 100

Favorable Capital Returns

How effectively does the company reward shareholders?

Around the middle of the covered universe — and capital returns are researched separately from the Suggested Investment Score.

Why it stands out

  • Business Quality meets the frozen IA Defensive qualification.
  • More disclosed holders are new or increasing than reducing or exiting.

What holds it back

  • Elevated valuation: the current market price reflects a premium to this company's historical valuation and comparable companies (Valuation Intelligence 33 out of 100, Expensive).

Long-term view

SNAP-ON INC scores 63 on Long-Term Potential (C), described by the research model as ordinary compounder. This describes business characteristics only — it is not a forecast of future returns.

Ownership view

Disclosed ownership evidence reads 47 (D): Positive disclosed activity. 5 tracked managers disclosed a position in the latest reporting period. Ownership filings are historical disclosures, not signals.

Valuation view

SNAP-ON INC reads 33 out of 100 on Valuation Intelligence, recorded as Expensive. The stock currently trades above most of its own recent valuation history and above comparable companies. This describes the price being paid relative to the company's financials — it is not a forecast and not a fair value. Valuation Intelligence is a research model and contributes nothing to the Suggested Investment Score or the daily ranking.

Capital returns view

SNAP-ON INC reads 69 out of 100 on Capital Returns Intelligence (Favorable Capital Returns), reflecting a dividend that has grown about 14.9% a year and a share count falling about 1.0% a year. Capital Returns Intelligence is a research model and contributes nothing to the Suggested Investment Score or the daily ranking.

What changed

No meaningful recorded changes in the stored history.

Risk Intelligence is a core model, Long-Term Potential, Fundamental Momentum, Valuation Intelligence and Capital Returns Intelligence are research models, and Ownership Intelligence is supplemental descriptive evidence. Valuation Intelligence and Capital Returns Intelligence each contribute 0% to the Suggested Investment Score. Nothing here is a recommendation.

Compare SNA with other companies

Research Collections

This company does not currently satisfy any collection rule. That is a stored research result, not a judgement about the business.

Browse collections

About a minute to read

The 60-Second Investment Brief

Written from stored research readings only. No hype. No trading signals. Just better evidence.

Why it's interesting

SNAP-ON INC (SNA) scores 54 out of 100 and ranks #294 of 1,152 qualified companies today. That places it in the top 43% of ranked companies. The stored tier for that score is not currently suggested.

Business strength

Risk Intelligence reads 67 out of 100 (C+), recorded as fundamentally qualified. Around the middle of the covered universe.

Long-term opportunity

Long-Term Potential reads 63 out of 100 (C), recorded as ordinary compounder. Around the middle of the covered universe.

What's improving or weakening

Fundamental Momentum reads 55 out of 100 (C−), recorded as middle. Around the middle of the covered universe.

What important owners are doing

Ownership Intelligence reads 47 out of 100 (D), recorded as positive disclosed activity. Weaker than most covered companies on this measure.

What kind of price you'd be paying

Valuation is currently the main point of caution: Valuation Intelligence reads 33 out of 100 (F), recorded as Expensive. SNAP-ON INC reads 33 out of 100 on Valuation Intelligence, recorded as Expensive. The stock currently trades above most of its own recent valuation history and above comparable companies. This describes the price being paid relative to the company's financials — it is not a forecast and not a fair value. Valuation Intelligence is a research model and contributes nothing to the Suggested Investment Score or the daily ranking.

How the company rewards shareholders

Capital Returns Intelligence reads 69 out of 100 (C+), recorded as Favorable Capital Returns. SNAP-ON INC reads 69 out of 100 on Capital Returns Intelligence (Favorable Capital Returns), reflecting a dividend that has grown about 14.9% a year and a share count falling about 1.0% a year. Capital Returns Intelligence is a research model and contributes nothing to the Suggested Investment Score or the daily ranking.

What could go wrong

Elevated valuation: the current market price reflects a premium to this company's historical valuation and comparable companies (Valuation Intelligence 33 out of 100, Expensive). Data confidence for this company is good.

Bottom line

No individual layer reaches the strongest band today. Fundamental Momentum and Ownership Intelligence remain the main area to watch. Separately from the score, valuation reads expensive at today's price.

Composite discovery model

Pro Investor Score

Pro Investor Score™

54 / 100

Not Currently Suggested

A 0–100 composite discovery score combining Risk Intelligence, Long-Term Potential, Fundamental Momentum, and Ownership Intelligence. It helps rank qualified companies for further research and does not predict future returns.

Rank
#294 of 694
Percentile
Top 43%
Ranking updated
September 12, 2026
161Rank weakened by 161 positions. Rank weakened by 161 positions.
Risk Intelligence
67

30% contribution

Long-Term Potential
63

30% contribution

Fundamental Momentum
55

20% contribution

Ownership Intelligence
47

20% contribution

Ownership Intelligence

47 / 100 · Mixed · 20% of the Pro Investor Score

SUPPLEMENTAL / DESCRIPTIVE INTELLIGENCE

Coverage: Good

Elite Investor Activity
30 · Weak

50% of Ownership Intelligence · 10% of the total score

Tracked professional-manager activity is weak.

Institutional Activity
91 · Strong

20% of Ownership Intelligence · 4% of the total score

Broad institutional evidence from resolved filings is strong.

Insider Activity
Insufficient Data

15% of Ownership Intelligence · 3% of the total score

No discretionary insider transactions are stored for this company, so this evidence is unavailable rather than neutral.

Strategic Ownership
Insufficient Data

15% of Ownership Intelligence · 3% of the total score

No qualifying major-holder filings are stored, so this evidence is unavailable rather than neutral.

Ownership Intelligence summarizes publicly disclosed activity among professional investment managers, broader institutions, company insiders, and significant strategic owners. It adds context to investment research but is not a validated predictor of future performance. Ownership information is publicly reported with a delay; the latest applicable reporting period is 2026-06-30, publicly disclosed 9/11/2026. Congressional activity is unavailable pending legal review and contributes nothing to this reading.

Why it ranks here

  • Exceptional long-term potential

    Stored profitability, capital efficiency and reinvestment readings rank near the top of the qualified universe.

What holds it back

  • Ownership evidence is not uniformly supportive

    Disclosed elite investor activity evidence is weak or neutral. Ownership evidence is supplemental and never automatically positive.

  • Ownership evidence disagrees

    Different owner groups point in different directions, so the combined reading is best read as mixed rather than uniformly favourable.

COMPOSITE DISCOVERY MODEL — RESEARCH STAGE · Data coverage Excellent. Rankings are recalculated daily using the latest available information. Individual components may update at different frequencies based on when new financial and ownership data becomes available.

Researched separately

Valuation Intelligence 33 · Expensive

RESEARCH MODEL

Valuation Intelligence is currently researched separately and does not affect the Suggested Investment Score or daily ranking.

Researched separately

Capital Returns Intelligence 69 · Favorable Capital Returns

RESEARCH MODEL

Capital Returns Intelligence is researched separately and contributes 0% to the Suggested Investment Score, the daily rank or any ranking event.

Score explanation

Why this company scores the way it does

Four research areas carry fixed weights. Each area is compared against every other eligible company, then weighted. The four contributions below add to 53.7 of the stored score (53.7).

  • Risk Intelligence

    30% of the score · contributes 17.7 points

    How strong and defensively sound is the company?

    Stands at the 59 percentile of eligible companies · stored reading 67 · 33% of this company’s total score

    How financially sturdy the company has been when conditions turned against it.

    How this area is measured

    Risk Intelligence reads stored balance-sheet strength, historical downside behaviour and the company's price-risk grouping. A stronger reading describes past resilience; it does not protect against future losses.

    Full methodology
  • Long-Term Potential

    30% of the score · contributes 22.6 points

    Does the business have the characteristics needed to create value over many years?

    Stands at the 75 percentile of eligible companies · stored reading 63 · 42% of this company’s total score

    Whether the business has the durable characteristics long-term owners look for.

    How this area is measured

    Long-Term Potential reads durability characteristics such as profitability consistency, cash generation and reinvestment capability over multiple reported periods.

    Full methodology
  • Fundamental Momentum

    20% of the score · contributes 11.6 points

    Is the underlying business getting stronger or weaker?

    Stands at the 58 percentile of eligible companies · stored reading 55 · 22% of this company’s total score

    Whether the reported business results have been getting stronger or weaker.

    How this area is measured

    Fundamental Momentum compares recent reported fundamentals with the company's own earlier periods, so improvement or deterioration is measured against its history rather than against a forecast.

    Full methodology
  • Ownership Intelligence

    20% of the score · contributes 1.7 points

    What are important owners actually doing?

    Stands at the 9 percentile of eligible companies · stored reading 47 · 3% of this company’s total score

    What large reporting owners have actually been doing with their positions.

    How this area is measured

    Ownership Intelligence reads public ownership filings: how many tracked reporting owners hold the company, and whether they were adding, holding, reducing or exiting in the latest disclosed period.

    Full methodology

What is helping the score

  • Long-Term Potential75 percentile, adding 22.6 points.

What deserves attention

  • Ownership Intelligence9 percentile, adding only 1.7 of a possible 20 points.
Outside the score

Additional research — not currently included in the primary Suggested Investment Score.

  • Valuation IntelligenceSNAP-ON INC reads 33 out of 100 on Valuation Intelligence, recorded as Expensive. The stock currently trades above most of its own recent valuation history and above comparable companies. This describes the price being paid relative to the company's financials — it is not a forecast and not a fair value.
  • Capital Returns IntelligenceSNAP-ON INC reads 69 out of 100 on Capital Returns Intelligence (Favorable Capital Returns), reflecting a dividend that has grown about 14.9% a year and a share count falling about 1.0% a year.

Pro Investor Intelligence™

Reported by insiders, large shareholders and professional funds. Shown beside our research, never blended into it.

Loading professional-investor activity…

Stored snapshots only

What changed

Research-score history available since September 2026.

Stored research history does not yet cover a full 30 days comparison for this company.

A change is reported as meaningful at 8 score points, 5 rank places, or any change of research classification. Nothing here is a recommendation to buy or sell.

Learn the metrics on this page

Plain-English definitions, with the formula and the limitations of each measure.

Fifth research lens · outside the score

Valuation Intelligence

Valuation Intelligence

Is today's price reasonable?

Valuation Intelligence is currently researched separately and does not affect the Suggested Investment Score or daily ranking.

33/ 100

Expensive

RESEARCH MODEL
Good coverage

Compared with its history

13

Expensive

Is this company expensive or inexpensive compared with its own history?

Compared with peers

6

Expensive

How expensive is this stock compared with similar companies?

Earnings & cash flow

63

Attractive

How much financial output does an investor receive relative to the price paid?

Growth-adjusted

59

Reasonable

Does the company's growth help justify the valuation investors are paying?

SNAP-ON INC reads 33 out of 100 on Valuation Intelligence, recorded as Expensive. The stock currently trades above most of its own recent valuation history and above comparable companies. This describes the price being paid relative to the company's financials — it is not a forecast and not a fair value.

Price data through September 11, 2026 · Financial data through the quarter ended July 4, 2026

Valuation history

Stored readings only. The dashed line is this company's own median for the selected measure.

Only one stored valuation reading exists so far, so there is nothing to chart yet. Valuation history builds forward from activation rather than being reconstructed.

Current P/E 18.8x · own median 14.8x

Valuation is inherently uncertain. A stock that appears inexpensive can continue falling, and a stock that appears expensive can continue rising. Valuation Intelligence provides context about the price investors are paying — it does not predict short-term market movements, and it never produces a fair value, a price target or a buy or sell range. Model VALUATION_INTELLIGENCE_V1.

Sixth research lens · outside the score

Capital Returns Intelligence

Capital Returns Intelligence

How effectively does the company reward shareholders?

Capital Returns Intelligence is researched separately and contributes 0% to the Suggested Investment Score, the daily rank or any ranking event.

69/ 100

Favorable Capital Returns

RESEARCH MODEL
Excellent coverage

Dividend Quality

88

Exceptional Capital Returns

Dividend reliability

Buyback Effectiveness

54

Moderate Capital Returns

Do buybacks actually reduce shares?

Dilution Control

56

Moderate Capital Returns

Is your ownership share protected?

Capital Return Sustainability

76

Strong Capital Returns

Can the cash flow support it?

Shareholder Yield

66

Favorable Capital Returns

Cash returned versus company value

SNAP-ON INC reads 69 out of 100 on Capital Returns Intelligence (Favorable Capital Returns), reflecting a dividend that has grown about 14.9% a year and a share count falling about 1.0% a year.

How returned cash was used

Dividends $491.40M · net repurchases $257.90M · total returned $749.30M · 66% of free cash flow

Price data through September 11, 2026 · Financial data through the quarter ended July 4, 2026

Capital returns history

Stored readings only. History builds forward from activation rather than being reconstructed.

Only one stored reading exists for this measure so far, so there is nothing to chart yet.

Why higher yield isn't always better

A very high dividend yield may reflect a falling share price or an unsustainable payout. Capital Returns Intelligence emphasizes consistency and sustainability rather than simply rewarding the highest yield.

Why buybacks can be misleading

Announced or gross buyback spending does not always mean shareholders are gaining ownership. Companies can simultaneously issue shares through employee compensation or acquisitions. Suggested Investments therefore considers actual share-count changes alongside repurchase spending.

What these terms mean
Dividend Yield
The annual dividend relative to the current share price.
Payout Ratio
The share of company earnings used to pay dividends.
Free Cash Flow Payout
How much of the company's available cash is being used for dividends.
Share Repurchases
When a company buys back its own stock.
Dilution
When the number of shares increases, reducing each existing share's percentage ownership of the company.
Shareholder Yield
A combined view of dividends and net share repurchases relative to the company's market value.

Capital Returns Intelligence describes how a company returns capital to shareholders. It is not a measure of stock-price performance, it does not predict future returns, and a strong reading is never a recommendation to buy. Dividends and repurchases can be reduced or stopped at any time. Model CAPITAL_RETURNS_INTELLIGENCE_V1, contributing 0% to the Pro Investor Score.

Stored daily snapshots only

Ranking history

Stored Suggested Investment ranking history
Today#294Score 54
30 days agoNot rankedNo stored score
90 days agoNot rankedNo stored score
First suggestedNot yet suggested
Highest rank#294

In the company’s own words

What this company does

Snap-on is a leading global innovator, manufacturer and marketer of tools, equipment, diagnostics, repair information and systems solutions for professional users performing critical tasks including those working in vehicle repair, aerospace, the military, natural resources, and manufacturing. From its founding in 1920, Snap-on has been recognized as the mark of the serious and the outward sign of the pride and dignity working men and women take in their professions. Products and services are sold through the company’s network of widely recognized franchisee vans as well as through direct and distributor channels, under a variety of notable brands. The company also provides financing programs to facilitate the sales of its products and to support its franchise business.

Snap-on markets its products and brands worldwide in more than 130 countries. Snap-on’s largest geographic market is the United States. In addition, Snap-on has a meaningful presence across continental Europe and in the Asia Pacific region, as well as in Canada and the United Kingdom.

The company began with the development of the original Snap-on interchangeable socket set and subsequently pioneered mobile tool distribution in the automotive repair market, where well-stocked vans sell to professional vehicle technicians at their place of business. Since that time, our principal value-creating mechanism has been to observe work and translate the insights gained into creative solutions that make essential tasks easier, meeting the needs of rapidly-evolving workplaces. Today, Snap-on extends its reach "beyond the garage," and the company’s "coherent growth" strategy focuses on developing and expanding its professional customer base in its legacy automotive market, as well as in adjacent markets, additional geographies and other areas, including in critical industries, where the cost and penalties for failure are high. In addition to its coherent growth strategy, Snap-on is committed to its "Value Creation Processes" – a set of strategic principles and processes designed to create value and employed in the areas of (i) safety; (ii) quality; (iii) customer connection; (iv) innovation; and (v) rapid continuous improvement ("RCI"). Snap-on’s RCI initiatives employ a structured set of tools and processes across multiple businesses and geographies intended to eliminate waste and improve operations. Savings from Snap-on’s RCI initiatives reflect benefits from a wide variety of ongoing efficiency, productivity and process improvements, including savings generated from product design cost reductions, improved manufacturing line set-up and change-over practices, lower-cost sourcing initiatives and facility consolidations.

Snap-on’s primary customer segments include: (i) commercial and industrial customers, including professionals in critical industries and in emerging markets; (ii) professional vehicle repair technicians who purchase products through the company’s multinational mobile tool distribution network; and (iii) other professional customers related to vehicle repair, including owners and managers of independent service and repair shops, as well as original equipment manufacturer ("OEM") dealership service and repair shops ("OEM dealerships"). Snap-on’s Financial Services customer segment includes: (i) franchisees’ customers, principally serving vehicle repair technicians, and Snap-on customers who require financing for the purchase or lease of tools, diagnostics, and equipment products on an extended-term payment plan; and (ii) franchisees who require financing options for vehicle and business needs.

Quoted from the business section of this company’s 10-K filed February 12, 2026. Read the filing

Four distinct intelligence areas

The IA view

Risk Intelligence

Production core

67

Fundamentally Qualified

+14.9 vs Jun 30, 2026

Business Quality qualification score from the locked IA Defensive Research Core. Price Risk stays a separate category and is never blended in.

As of Sep 11, 2026

Long-Term Potential

Research model

64

Elite Compounder

+13.2 vs Jun 30, 2026

Durable business economics and reinvestment characteristics. Independent external validation is pending.

As of Sep 11, 2026

Fundamental Momentum

Research model

56

Middle

+6.3 vs Jun 30, 2026

Direction and breadth of change in underlying business fundamentals. Not a price-momentum signal.

As of Sep 11, 2026

Elite Investor Activity

Supplemental

30

Bottom range

0 vs Jun 30, 2026

Only 5 tracked managers disclosed a position — treat as limited coverage.

As of Sep 11, 2026

Company intelligence

SNA score history

Each area is measured and reported separately. No combined score exists.

SNA intelligence history from 2023-09-30 to 2026-09-11. Risk Intelligence 66.7 on 2026-09-11, up 14.9 from 51.8 on 2026-06-30. Long-Term Potential 63.5 on 2026-09-11, up 13.2 from 50.3 on 2026-06-30. Fundamental Momentum 55.5 on 2026-09-11, up 6.3 from 49.2 on 2026-06-30. Elite Investor Activity 30 on 2026-09-11, unchanged 0 from 30 on 2026-06-30. Each area is reported separately and is never combined into a single score.

Risk Intelligence 66.7 as of Sep 11, 2026 (+14.9 vs prior period) · Production core

Long-Term Potential 63.5 as of Sep 11, 2026 (+13.2 vs prior period) · Research model

Fundamental Momentum 55.5 as of Sep 11, 2026 (+6.3 vs prior period) · Research model

Elite Investor Activity 30 as of Sep 11, 2026 (0 vs prior period) · Supplemental

Share price

SNA price history

Closing prices adjusted for splits and dividends. Past prices do not indicate future results.

6M change
+4.4%
1Y change
+16.1%
3Y change
+55.6%
5Y change
+94.9%
Max change
+165.0%

Last stored close $375.44 · +16.1% over the selected range · 52 sessions shown

Balanced evidence

Why IA likes it

  • Business Quality meets the frozen IA Defensive qualification.
  • More disclosed holders are new or increasing than reducing or exiting.

Risk and uncertainty

What IA doesn’t like

  • No specific negative evidence is available. This is not evidence of low risk.

What would change our view

  • Business Quality falling below the frozen qualification threshold.
  • Price Risk moving to a less favorable category.
  • A sustained reversal in the Fundamental Momentum research evidence.
  • New material public ownership disclosures.

Public filings · descriptive only

Elite Investor Activity

Reporting holders

1

New holders

1

Increasing

0

Reducing

0

Exiting

0

Coverage

Excellent

Positive disclosed activity · Report period 2016-12-31 · Public 12/22/2023

ManagerChangePortfolio weightRankDisclosed

Insufficient high-confidence manager coverage.

Objective stored changes

What changed

  • Risk Intelligence

    Price Risk category changed

    Price Risk moved from Not Available to Lower risk.

  • Fundamental Momentum

    Fundamental Momentum improved

    Fundamental Momentum research score moved from 49.2 to 54.2.

  • Risk Intelligence

    IA Defensive improved

    Business Quality qualification score moved from 49.8 to 51.8.

  • Elite Investor Activity

    Elite Investor Consensus weakened

    Disclosed agreement among tracked managers moved from 58 to 30 for the reporting period ending 2026-06-30.

  • Elite Investor Activity

    Elite Investor Consensus weakened

    Disclosed agreement among tracked managers moved from 75 to 58 for the reporting period ending 2026-03-31.

  • Elite Investor Activity

    Tracked managers initiated positions

    2 tracked managers first disclosed a position for the reporting period ending 2025-09-30.

  • Elite Investor Activity

    Elite Investor Consensus weakened

    Disclosed agreement among tracked managers moved from 90 to 70 for the reporting period ending 2025-06-30.

  • Elite Investor Activity

    Elite Investor Consensus strengthened

    Disclosed agreement among tracked managers moved from 70 to 90 for the reporting period ending 2025-03-31.

  • Elite Investor Activity

    Elite Investor Consensus weakened

    Disclosed agreement among tracked managers moved from 100 to 70 for the reporting period ending 2024-12-31.

  • Elite Investor Activity

    Tracked managers initiated positions

    5 tracked managers first disclosed a position for the reporting period ending 2024-09-30.

Ownership timeline

No high-confidence public ownership events are available.

General research only. Not personalized advice. Public filings may be delayed, amended, incomplete, or reflect positions that have changed since the reporting date.