Suggestions

ALB · NYSE

ALBEMARLE CORP

Private beta

Sector unavailable · Industry unavailable

$117.52

-3.76%

Close on Sep 11, 2026

Watch

Updated 6/30/2026

Long-term research evidence only. No price targets, no trading signals, no recommendations.

Investment Report Card

ALBEMARLE CORP

Sector unavailable · Data confidence good

24 / 100

Rank #664 of 1,152 qualified companies

Top 96% · Not Currently Suggested

Risk Intelligence

Core Model
D+

52 / 100

Restricted

How strong and defensively sound is the company?

Weaker than most covered companies on this measure.

Long-Term Potential

Research Model
F

31 / 100

Not Scored

Does the business have the characteristics needed to create value over many years?

Weaker than most covered companies on this measure.

Fundamental Momentum

Research Model
A

90 / 100

Not Scored

Is the underlying business getting stronger or weaker?

Among the strongest readings on this measure.

Ownership Intelligence

Supplemental Intelligence
D

45 / 100

Positive disclosed activity

What are important owners actually doing?

Weaker than most covered companies on this measure.

Valuation Intelligence

Research Model
C+

65 / 100

Attractive

Is today's price reasonable?

Around the middle of the covered universe — and valuation is researched separately from the Suggested Investment Score.

Capital Returns Intelligence

Research Model
D

46 / 100

Moderate Capital Returns

How effectively does the company reward shareholders?

Weaker than most covered companies on this measure — and capital returns are researched separately from the Suggested Investment Score.

Why it stands out

  • More disclosed holders are new or increasing than reducing or exiting.
  • Attractive valuation: the stock reads 65 out of 100 on Valuation Intelligence (Attractive) relative to its own history and comparable companies.

What holds it back

No weakening evidence is recorded in today's readings.

Long-term view

ALBEMARLE CORP scores 31 on Long-Term Potential (F), described by the research model as not scored. This describes business characteristics only — it is not a forecast of future returns.

Ownership view

Disclosed ownership evidence reads 45 (D): Positive disclosed activity. 4 tracked managers disclosed a position in the latest reporting period. Ownership filings are historical disclosures, not signals.

Valuation view

ALBEMARLE CORP reads 65 out of 100 on Valuation Intelligence, recorded as Attractive. The stock currently trades below most of its own recent valuation history and above comparable companies. This describes the price being paid relative to the company's financials — it is not a forecast and not a fair value. Valuation Intelligence is a research model and contributes nothing to the Suggested Investment Score or the daily ranking.

Capital returns view

ALBEMARLE CORP reads 46 out of 100 on Capital Returns Intelligence (Moderate Capital Returns), reflecting a dividend that has grown about 3.4% a year and a share count rising about 3.0% a year. Capital Returns Intelligence is a research model and contributes nothing to the Suggested Investment Score or the daily ranking.

What changed

No meaningful recorded changes in the stored history.

Risk Intelligence is a core model, Long-Term Potential, Fundamental Momentum, Valuation Intelligence and Capital Returns Intelligence are research models, and Ownership Intelligence is supplemental descriptive evidence. Valuation Intelligence and Capital Returns Intelligence each contribute 0% to the Suggested Investment Score. Nothing here is a recommendation.

Compare ALB with other companies

Appears in

Rule-based membership

Membership means the company satisfied a published rule on the latest research build. It is not a recommendation.

About a minute to read

The 60-Second Investment Brief

Written from stored research readings only. No hype. No trading signals. Just better evidence.

Why it's interesting

ALBEMARLE CORP (ALB) scores 24 out of 100 and ranks #664 of 1,152 qualified companies today. That places it in the top 96% of ranked companies. The stored tier for that score is not currently suggested.

Business strength

Risk Intelligence reads 52 out of 100 (D+), recorded as restricted. Weaker than most covered companies on this measure.

Long-term opportunity

Long-Term Potential reads 31 out of 100 (F), recorded as not scored. Weaker than most covered companies on this measure.

What's improving or weakening

Fundamental Momentum reads 90 out of 100 (A), recorded as not scored. Among the strongest readings on this measure.

What important owners are doing

Ownership Intelligence reads 45 out of 100 (D), recorded as positive disclosed activity. Weaker than most covered companies on this measure.

What kind of price you'd be paying

Valuation currently appears favourable: Valuation Intelligence reads 65 out of 100 (C+), recorded as Attractive. ALBEMARLE CORP reads 65 out of 100 on Valuation Intelligence, recorded as Attractive. The stock currently trades below most of its own recent valuation history and above comparable companies. This describes the price being paid relative to the company's financials — it is not a forecast and not a fair value. Valuation Intelligence is a research model and contributes nothing to the Suggested Investment Score or the daily ranking.

How the company rewards shareholders

Capital Returns Intelligence reads 46 out of 100 (D), recorded as Moderate Capital Returns. ALBEMARLE CORP reads 46 out of 100 on Capital Returns Intelligence (Moderate Capital Returns), reflecting a dividend that has grown about 3.4% a year and a share count rising about 3.0% a year. Capital Returns Intelligence is a research model and contributes nothing to the Suggested Investment Score or the daily ranking.

What could go wrong

No weakening factors are recorded in today's stored readings, and data confidence is good. Absence of a recorded weakness is not evidence of safety.

Bottom line

Its strongest recorded evidence is Fundamental Momentum. Risk Intelligence and Long-Term Potential and Ownership Intelligence remain the main area to watch. Separately from the score, valuation reads attractive at today's price.

Composite discovery model

Suggested Investment Score

Suggested Investment Score

24 / 100

Not Currently Suggested

A 0–100 composite discovery score combining Risk Intelligence, Long-Term Potential, Fundamental Momentum, and Ownership Intelligence. It helps rank qualified companies for further research and does not predict future returns.

Rank
#664 of 694
Percentile
Top 96%
Ranking updated
September 12, 2026
378Rank weakened by 378 positions. Rank weakened by 378 positions.
Risk Intelligence
52

30% contribution

Long-Term Potential
31

30% contribution

Fundamental Momentum
90

20% contribution

Ownership Intelligence
45

20% contribution

Ownership Intelligence

45 / 100 · Mixed · 20% of the Suggested Investment Score

SUPPLEMENTAL / DESCRIPTIVE INTELLIGENCE

Coverage: Good

Elite Investor Activity
25 · Weak

50% of Ownership Intelligence · 10% of the total score

Tracked professional-manager activity is weak.

Institutional Activity
93 · Strong

20% of Ownership Intelligence · 4% of the total score

Broad institutional evidence from resolved filings is strong.

Insider Activity
Insufficient Data

15% of Ownership Intelligence · 3% of the total score

No discretionary insider transactions are stored for this company, so this evidence is unavailable rather than neutral.

Strategic Ownership
Insufficient Data

15% of Ownership Intelligence · 3% of the total score

No qualifying major-holder filings are stored, so this evidence is unavailable rather than neutral.

Ownership Intelligence summarizes publicly disclosed activity among professional investment managers, broader institutions, company insiders, and significant strategic owners. It adds context to investment research but is not a validated predictor of future performance. Ownership information is publicly reported with a delay; the latest applicable reporting period is 2026-06-30, publicly disclosed 9/11/2026. Congressional activity is unavailable pending legal review and contributes nothing to this reading.

Why it ranks here

  • Improving fundamentals

    Recent reported business trends rank among the strongest in the qualified universe.

What holds it back

  • Risk Intelligence is less favourable

    Defensive characteristics rank below the middle of the qualified universe.

  • Long-term potential is mid-pack

    Long-Term Potential ranks below the qualified median. This remains a research model.

  • Ownership evidence is not uniformly supportive

    Disclosed elite investor activity evidence is weak or neutral. Ownership evidence is supplemental and never automatically positive.

  • Ownership evidence disagrees

    Different owner groups point in different directions, so the combined reading is best read as mixed rather than uniformly favourable.

  • Price Risk is less favourable

    Price Risk sits in the higher category relative to other qualified companies.

COMPOSITE DISCOVERY MODEL — RESEARCH STAGE · Data coverage Excellent. Rankings are recalculated daily using the latest available information. Individual components may update at different frequencies based on when new financial and ownership data becomes available.

Researched separately

Valuation Intelligence 65 · Attractive

RESEARCH MODEL

Valuation Intelligence is currently researched separately and does not affect the Suggested Investment Score or daily ranking.

Researched separately

Capital Returns Intelligence 46 · Moderate Capital Returns

RESEARCH MODEL

Capital Returns Intelligence is researched separately and contributes 0% to the Suggested Investment Score, the daily rank or any ranking event.

Score explanation

Why this company scores the way it does

Four research areas carry fixed weights. Each area is compared against every other eligible company, then weighted. The four contributions below add to 23.6 of the stored score (23.6).

  • Risk Intelligence

    30% of the score · contributes 1.3 points

    How strong and defensively sound is the company?

    Stands at the 4 percentile of eligible companies · stored reading 52 · 6% of this company’s total score

    How financially sturdy the company has been when conditions turned against it.

    How this area is measured

    Risk Intelligence reads stored balance-sheet strength, historical downside behaviour and the company's price-risk grouping. A stronger reading describes past resilience; it does not protect against future losses.

    Full methodology
  • Long-Term Potential

    30% of the score · contributes 1.5 points

    Does the business have the characteristics needed to create value over many years?

    Stands at the 5 percentile of eligible companies · stored reading 31 · 7% of this company’s total score

    Whether the business has the durable characteristics long-term owners look for.

    How this area is measured

    Long-Term Potential reads durability characteristics such as profitability consistency, cash generation and reinvestment capability over multiple reported periods.

    Full methodology
  • Fundamental Momentum

    20% of the score · contributes 19.6 points

    Is the underlying business getting stronger or weaker?

    Stands at the 98 percentile of eligible companies · stored reading 90 · 83% of this company’s total score

    Whether the reported business results have been getting stronger or weaker.

    How this area is measured

    Fundamental Momentum compares recent reported fundamentals with the company's own earlier periods, so improvement or deterioration is measured against its history rather than against a forecast.

    Full methodology
  • Ownership Intelligence

    20% of the score · contributes 1.1 points

    What are important owners actually doing?

    Stands at the 6 percentile of eligible companies · stored reading 45 · 5% of this company’s total score

    What large reporting owners have actually been doing with their positions.

    How this area is measured

    Ownership Intelligence reads public ownership filings: how many tracked reporting owners hold the company, and whether they were adding, holding, reducing or exiting in the latest disclosed period.

    Full methodology

What is helping the score

  • Fundamental Momentum98 percentile, adding 19.6 points.

What deserves attention

  • Risk Intelligence4 percentile, adding only 1.3 of a possible 30 points.
  • Long-Term Potential5 percentile, adding only 1.5 of a possible 30 points.
  • Ownership Intelligence6 percentile, adding only 1.1 of a possible 20 points.
Outside the score

Additional research — not currently included in the primary Suggested Investment Score.

  • Valuation IntelligenceALBEMARLE CORP reads 65 out of 100 on Valuation Intelligence, recorded as Attractive. The stock currently trades below most of its own recent valuation history and above comparable companies. This describes the price being paid relative to the company's financials — it is not a forecast and not a fair value.
  • Capital Returns IntelligenceALBEMARLE CORP reads 46 out of 100 on Capital Returns Intelligence (Moderate Capital Returns), reflecting a dividend that has grown about 3.4% a year and a share count rising about 3.0% a year.

Stored snapshots only

What changed

Research-score history available since September 2026.

Stored research history does not yet cover a full 30 days comparison for this company.

A change is reported as meaningful at 8 score points, 5 rank places, or any change of research classification. Nothing here is a recommendation to buy or sell.

Learn the metrics on this page

Plain-English definitions, with the formula and the limitations of each measure.

Fifth research lens · outside the score

Valuation Intelligence

Valuation Intelligence

Is today's price reasonable?

Valuation Intelligence is currently researched separately and does not affect the Suggested Investment Score or daily ranking.

65/ 100

Attractive

RESEARCH MODEL
Excellent coverage

Compared with its history

66

Attractive

Is this company expensive or inexpensive compared with its own history?

Compared with peers

39

Elevated

How expensive is this stock compared with similar companies?

Earnings & cash flow

63

Attractive

How much financial output does an investor receive relative to the price paid?

Growth-adjusted

100

Very Attractive

Does the company's growth help justify the valuation investors are paying?

ALBEMARLE CORP reads 65 out of 100 on Valuation Intelligence, recorded as Attractive. The stock currently trades below most of its own recent valuation history and above comparable companies. This describes the price being paid relative to the company's financials — it is not a forecast and not a fair value.

Price data through September 11, 2026 · Financial data through the quarter ended June 30, 2026

Valuation history

Stored readings only. The dashed line is this company's own median for the selected measure.

Only one stored valuation reading exists so far, so there is nothing to chart yet. Valuation history builds forward from activation rather than being reconstructed.

Current P/E 61.9x · own median 21.5x · peer median 12.8x

Valuation is inherently uncertain. A stock that appears inexpensive can continue falling, and a stock that appears expensive can continue rising. Valuation Intelligence provides context about the price investors are paying — it does not predict short-term market movements, and it never produces a fair value, a price target or a buy or sell range. Model VALUATION_INTELLIGENCE_V1.

Sixth research lens · outside the score

Capital Returns Intelligence

Capital Returns Intelligence

How effectively does the company reward shareholders?

Capital Returns Intelligence is researched separately and contributes 0% to the Suggested Investment Score, the daily rank or any ranking event.

46/ 100

Moderate Capital Returns

RESEARCH MODEL
Excellent coverage

Dividend Quality

83

Exceptional Capital Returns

Dividend reliability

Buyback Effectiveness

5

Limited Capital Returns

Do buybacks actually reduce shares?

No net share repurchases are recorded in the stored cash-flow statements.

Dilution Control

15

Limited Capital Returns

Is your ownership share protected?

Capital Return Sustainability

93

Exceptional Capital Returns

Can the cash flow support it?

Shareholder Yield

25

Limited Capital Returns

Cash returned versus company value

ALBEMARLE CORP reads 46 out of 100 on Capital Returns Intelligence (Moderate Capital Returns), reflecting a dividend that has grown about 3.4% a year and a share count rising about 3.0% a year.

No measurable cash was returned to shareholders through dividends or net repurchases in the latest stored statements.

Price data through September 11, 2026 · Financial data through the quarter ended June 30, 2026

Capital returns history

Stored readings only. History builds forward from activation rather than being reconstructed.

Only one stored reading exists for this measure so far, so there is nothing to chart yet.

Why higher yield isn't always better

A very high dividend yield may reflect a falling share price or an unsustainable payout. Capital Returns Intelligence emphasizes consistency and sustainability rather than simply rewarding the highest yield.

Why buybacks can be misleading

Announced or gross buyback spending does not always mean shareholders are gaining ownership. Companies can simultaneously issue shares through employee compensation or acquisitions. Suggested Investments therefore considers actual share-count changes alongside repurchase spending.

What these terms mean
Dividend Yield
The annual dividend relative to the current share price.
Payout Ratio
The share of company earnings used to pay dividends.
Free Cash Flow Payout
How much of the company's available cash is being used for dividends.
Share Repurchases
When a company buys back its own stock.
Dilution
When the number of shares increases, reducing each existing share's percentage ownership of the company.
Shareholder Yield
A combined view of dividends and net share repurchases relative to the company's market value.

Capital Returns Intelligence describes how a company returns capital to shareholders. It is not a measure of stock-price performance, it does not predict future returns, and a strong reading is never a recommendation to buy. Dividends and repurchases can be reduced or stopped at any time. Model CAPITAL_RETURNS_INTELLIGENCE_V1, contributing 0% to the Suggested Investment Score.

Stored daily snapshots only

Ranking history

Stored Suggested Investment ranking history
Today#664Score 24
30 days agoNot rankedNo stored score
90 days agoNot rankedNo stored score
First suggestedNot yet suggested
Highest rank#664

In the company’s own words

What this company does

Our significant manufacturing presence and sales activities in the E.U. and other global regions require significant compliance costs and may result in increases in the costs of raw materials we purchase and the products we sell. Increases in the costs of our products could result in a decrease in their overall demand; additionally, customers may seek products with lower regulatory compliance requirements, which could also result in a decrease in the demand of certain products subject to the REACH regulations.

The U.S. Toxic Substances Control Act ("TSCA") requires chemicals to be assessed against a risk-based safety standard and calls for the elimination of unreasonable risks identified during risk evaluation. This regulation and other pending initiatives at the U.S. state level, as well as initiatives in Canada, Asia and other regions, could potentially require toxicological testing and risk assessments of a wide variety of chemicals, including chemicals used or produced by us. These assessments may result in heightened concerns about the chemicals involved and additional requirements being placed on the production, handling, labeling or use of the subject chemicals. Such concerns and additional requirements could also increase the cost incurred by our customers to use our chemical products and otherwise limit the use of these products, which could lead to a decrease in demand for these products. Such a decrease in demand could have an adverse impact on our business and results of operations.

We could be subject to damages based on claims brought against us by our customers or lose customers as a result of the failure of our products to meet certain quality specifications.

Our products enable important performance attributes of our customers’ products. If a product fails to perform in a manner consistent with quality specifications or has a shorter useful life than guaranteed, a customer of ours could seek the replacement of the product or damages for costs incurred as a result of the product failing to perform as guaranteed. These risks apply to our refinery catalysts in particular because, in certain instances, we sell our refinery catalysts under agreements that contain limited performance and life cycle guarantees. Also, because many of our products are integrated into our customers’ products, we may be requested to participate in, or fund in whole or in part the costs of, a product recall conducted by a customer. For example, some of our businesses supply products to customers in the automotive industry. In the event one of these customers conducts a product recall that it believes is related to one of our products, we may be asked to participate in, or fund in whole or in part, such a recall.

Quoted from the business section of this company’s 10-K filed February 11, 2026. Read the filing

Four distinct intelligence areas

The IA view

Risk Intelligence

Production core

52

Fundamentally Qualified

+5.3 vs Jun 30, 2026

Business Quality qualification score from the locked IA Defensive Research Core. Price Risk stays a separate category and is never blended in.

As of Sep 11, 2026

Long-Term Potential

Research model

31

Weak Compounder

No prior period to compare

Durable business economics and reinvestment characteristics. Independent external validation is pending.

As of Sep 11, 2026

Fundamental Momentum

Research model

90

Accelerating

No prior period to compare

Direction and breadth of change in underlying business fundamentals. Not a price-momentum signal.

As of Sep 11, 2026

Elite Investor Activity

Supplemental

25

Bottom range

0 vs Jun 30, 2026

Only 4 tracked managers disclosed a position — treat as limited coverage.

As of Sep 11, 2026

Company intelligence

ALB score history

Each area is measured and reported separately. No combined score exists.

ALB intelligence history from 2023-09-30 to 2026-09-11. Risk Intelligence 51.9 on 2026-09-11, up 5.3 from 46.6 on 2026-06-30. Long-Term Potential 30.7 on 2026-09-11. Fundamental Momentum 90.3 on 2026-09-11. Elite Investor Activity 25 on 2026-09-11, unchanged 0 from 25 on 2026-06-30. Each area is reported separately and is never combined into a single score.

Risk Intelligence 51.9 as of Sep 11, 2026 (+5.3 vs prior period) · Production core

Long-Term Potential 30.7 as of Sep 11, 2026 · Research model

Fundamental Momentum 90.3 as of Sep 11, 2026 · Research model

Elite Investor Activity 25 as of Sep 11, 2026 (0 vs prior period) · Supplemental

Share price

ALB price history

Closing prices adjusted for splits and dividends, through Sep 11, 2026. Past prices do not indicate future results.

6M change
-27.7%
1Y change
+59.2%
3Y change
-33.1%
5Y change
-46.0%
Max change
+76.3%

Last stored close $117.52 · +59.2% over the selected range · 52 sessions shown

Balanced evidence

Why IA likes it

  • More disclosed holders are new or increasing than reducing or exiting.

Risk and uncertainty

What IA doesn’t like

  • No specific negative evidence is available. This is not evidence of low risk.

What would change our view

  • Business Quality falling below the frozen qualification threshold.
  • Price Risk moving to a less favorable category.
  • A sustained reversal in the Fundamental Momentum research evidence.
  • New material public ownership disclosures.

Public filings · descriptive only

Elite Investor Activity

Reporting holders

1

New holders

1

Increasing

0

Reducing

0

Exiting

0

Coverage

Excellent

Positive disclosed activity · Report period 2016-12-31 · Public 12/22/2023

ManagerChangePortfolio weightRankDisclosed

Insufficient high-confidence manager coverage.

Objective stored changes

What changed

  • Risk Intelligence

    IA Defensive improved

    Business Quality qualification score moved from 19.7 to 46.6.

  • Elite Investor Activity

    Elite Investor Consensus weakened

    Disclosed agreement among tracked managers moved from 38 to 25 for the reporting period ending 2026-06-30.

  • Risk Intelligence

    Exit Review triggered

    Business Quality fell below the Exit Review threshold. Exit Review is a prompt for review, never an automatic sell.

  • Elite Investor Activity

    Elite Investor Consensus weakened

    Disclosed agreement among tracked managers moved from 63 to 38 for the reporting period ending 2026-03-31.

  • Elite Investor Activity

    Elite Investor Consensus strengthened

    Disclosed agreement among tracked managers moved from 33 to 63 for the reporting period ending 2025-12-31.

  • Elite Investor Activity

    Elite Investor Consensus weakened

    Disclosed agreement among tracked managers moved from 50 to 33 for the reporting period ending 2025-09-30.

  • Elite Investor Activity

    Elite Investor Consensus strengthened

    Disclosed agreement among tracked managers moved from 33 to 50 for the reporting period ending 2025-06-30.

  • Elite Investor Activity

    Elite Investor Consensus weakened

    Disclosed agreement among tracked managers moved from 50 to 33 for the reporting period ending 2025-03-31.

  • Elite Investor Activity

    Elite Investor Consensus weakened

    Disclosed agreement among tracked managers moved from 100 to 50 for the reporting period ending 2024-12-31.

  • Elite Investor Activity

    Tracked managers initiated positions

    4 tracked managers first disclosed a position for the reporting period ending 2024-09-30.

Ownership timeline

No high-confidence public ownership events are available.

General research only. Not personalized advice. Public filings may be delayed, amended, incomplete, or reflect positions that have changed since the reporting date.