Risk Intelligence
52 / 100
Restricted
How strong and defensively sound is the company?
Weaker than most covered companies on this measure.
ALB · NYSE
Sector unavailable · Industry unavailable
$117.52
-3.76%
Close on Sep 11, 2026
Updated 6/30/2026
Long-term research evidence only. No price targets, no trading signals, no recommendations.
Investment Report Card
Sector unavailable · Data confidence good
24 / 100
Rank #664 of 1,152 qualified companies
Top 96% · Not Currently Suggested
52 / 100
Restricted
How strong and defensively sound is the company?
Weaker than most covered companies on this measure.
31 / 100
Not Scored
Does the business have the characteristics needed to create value over many years?
Weaker than most covered companies on this measure.
90 / 100
Not Scored
Is the underlying business getting stronger or weaker?
Among the strongest readings on this measure.
45 / 100
Positive disclosed activity
What are important owners actually doing?
Weaker than most covered companies on this measure.
65 / 100
Attractive
Is today's price reasonable?
Around the middle of the covered universe — and valuation is researched separately from the Suggested Investment Score.
46 / 100
Moderate Capital Returns
How effectively does the company reward shareholders?
Weaker than most covered companies on this measure — and capital returns are researched separately from the Suggested Investment Score.
No weakening evidence is recorded in today's readings.
ALBEMARLE CORP scores 31 on Long-Term Potential (F), described by the research model as not scored. This describes business characteristics only — it is not a forecast of future returns.
Disclosed ownership evidence reads 45 (D): Positive disclosed activity. 4 tracked managers disclosed a position in the latest reporting period. Ownership filings are historical disclosures, not signals.
ALBEMARLE CORP reads 65 out of 100 on Valuation Intelligence, recorded as Attractive. The stock currently trades below most of its own recent valuation history and above comparable companies. This describes the price being paid relative to the company's financials — it is not a forecast and not a fair value. Valuation Intelligence is a research model and contributes nothing to the Suggested Investment Score or the daily ranking.
ALBEMARLE CORP reads 46 out of 100 on Capital Returns Intelligence (Moderate Capital Returns), reflecting a dividend that has grown about 3.4% a year and a share count rising about 3.0% a year. Capital Returns Intelligence is a research model and contributes nothing to the Suggested Investment Score or the daily ranking.
No meaningful recorded changes in the stored history.
Risk Intelligence is a core model, Long-Term Potential, Fundamental Momentum, Valuation Intelligence and Capital Returns Intelligence are research models, and Ownership Intelligence is supplemental descriptive evidence. Valuation Intelligence and Capital Returns Intelligence each contribute 0% to the Suggested Investment Score. Nothing here is a recommendation.
Compare ALB with other companiesAppears in
Membership means the company satisfied a published rule on the latest research build. It is not a recommendation.
About a minute to read
Written from stored research readings only. No hype. No trading signals. Just better evidence.
ALBEMARLE CORP (ALB) scores 24 out of 100 and ranks #664 of 1,152 qualified companies today. That places it in the top 96% of ranked companies. The stored tier for that score is not currently suggested.
Risk Intelligence reads 52 out of 100 (D+), recorded as restricted. Weaker than most covered companies on this measure.
Long-Term Potential reads 31 out of 100 (F), recorded as not scored. Weaker than most covered companies on this measure.
Fundamental Momentum reads 90 out of 100 (A), recorded as not scored. Among the strongest readings on this measure.
Ownership Intelligence reads 45 out of 100 (D), recorded as positive disclosed activity. Weaker than most covered companies on this measure.
Valuation currently appears favourable: Valuation Intelligence reads 65 out of 100 (C+), recorded as Attractive. ALBEMARLE CORP reads 65 out of 100 on Valuation Intelligence, recorded as Attractive. The stock currently trades below most of its own recent valuation history and above comparable companies. This describes the price being paid relative to the company's financials — it is not a forecast and not a fair value. Valuation Intelligence is a research model and contributes nothing to the Suggested Investment Score or the daily ranking.
Capital Returns Intelligence reads 46 out of 100 (D), recorded as Moderate Capital Returns. ALBEMARLE CORP reads 46 out of 100 on Capital Returns Intelligence (Moderate Capital Returns), reflecting a dividend that has grown about 3.4% a year and a share count rising about 3.0% a year. Capital Returns Intelligence is a research model and contributes nothing to the Suggested Investment Score or the daily ranking.
No weakening factors are recorded in today's stored readings, and data confidence is good. Absence of a recorded weakness is not evidence of safety.
Its strongest recorded evidence is Fundamental Momentum. Risk Intelligence and Long-Term Potential and Ownership Intelligence remain the main area to watch. Separately from the score, valuation reads attractive at today's price.
Composite discovery model
Suggested Investment Score
24 / 100
A 0–100 composite discovery score combining Risk Intelligence, Long-Term Potential, Fundamental Momentum, and Ownership Intelligence. It helps rank qualified companies for further research and does not predict future returns.
30% contribution
30% contribution
20% contribution
20% contribution
45 / 100 · Mixed · 20% of the Suggested Investment Score
Coverage: Good
50% of Ownership Intelligence · 10% of the total score
Tracked professional-manager activity is weak.
20% of Ownership Intelligence · 4% of the total score
Broad institutional evidence from resolved filings is strong.
15% of Ownership Intelligence · 3% of the total score
No discretionary insider transactions are stored for this company, so this evidence is unavailable rather than neutral.
15% of Ownership Intelligence · 3% of the total score
No qualifying major-holder filings are stored, so this evidence is unavailable rather than neutral.
Ownership Intelligence summarizes publicly disclosed activity among professional investment managers, broader institutions, company insiders, and significant strategic owners. It adds context to investment research but is not a validated predictor of future performance. Ownership information is publicly reported with a delay; the latest applicable reporting period is 2026-06-30, publicly disclosed 9/11/2026. Congressional activity is unavailable pending legal review and contributes nothing to this reading.
Improving fundamentals
Recent reported business trends rank among the strongest in the qualified universe.
Risk Intelligence is less favourable
Defensive characteristics rank below the middle of the qualified universe.
Long-term potential is mid-pack
Long-Term Potential ranks below the qualified median. This remains a research model.
Ownership evidence is not uniformly supportive
Disclosed elite investor activity evidence is weak or neutral. Ownership evidence is supplemental and never automatically positive.
Ownership evidence disagrees
Different owner groups point in different directions, so the combined reading is best read as mixed rather than uniformly favourable.
Price Risk is less favourable
Price Risk sits in the higher category relative to other qualified companies.
COMPOSITE DISCOVERY MODEL — RESEARCH STAGE · Data coverage Excellent. Rankings are recalculated daily using the latest available information. Individual components may update at different frequencies based on when new financial and ownership data becomes available.
Researched separately
Valuation Intelligence 65 · Attractive
Valuation Intelligence is currently researched separately and does not affect the Suggested Investment Score or daily ranking.
Researched separately
Capital Returns Intelligence 46 · Moderate Capital Returns
Capital Returns Intelligence is researched separately and contributes 0% to the Suggested Investment Score, the daily rank or any ranking event.
Score explanation
Four research areas carry fixed weights. Each area is compared against every other eligible company, then weighted. The four contributions below add to 23.6 of the stored score (23.6).
Risk Intelligence
30% of the score · contributes 1.3 points
How strong and defensively sound is the company?
Stands at the 4 percentile of eligible companies · stored reading 52 · 6% of this company’s total score
How financially sturdy the company has been when conditions turned against it.
Risk Intelligence reads stored balance-sheet strength, historical downside behaviour and the company's price-risk grouping. A stronger reading describes past resilience; it does not protect against future losses.
Full methodologyLong-Term Potential
30% of the score · contributes 1.5 points
Does the business have the characteristics needed to create value over many years?
Stands at the 5 percentile of eligible companies · stored reading 31 · 7% of this company’s total score
Whether the business has the durable characteristics long-term owners look for.
Long-Term Potential reads durability characteristics such as profitability consistency, cash generation and reinvestment capability over multiple reported periods.
Full methodologyFundamental Momentum
20% of the score · contributes 19.6 points
Is the underlying business getting stronger or weaker?
Stands at the 98 percentile of eligible companies · stored reading 90 · 83% of this company’s total score
Whether the reported business results have been getting stronger or weaker.
Fundamental Momentum compares recent reported fundamentals with the company's own earlier periods, so improvement or deterioration is measured against its history rather than against a forecast.
Full methodologyOwnership Intelligence
20% of the score · contributes 1.1 points
What are important owners actually doing?
Stands at the 6 percentile of eligible companies · stored reading 45 · 5% of this company’s total score
What large reporting owners have actually been doing with their positions.
Ownership Intelligence reads public ownership filings: how many tracked reporting owners hold the company, and whether they were adding, holding, reducing or exiting in the latest disclosed period.
Full methodologyAdditional research — not currently included in the primary Suggested Investment Score.
Stored snapshots only
Research-score history available since September 2026.
Stored research history does not yet cover a full 30 days comparison for this company.
A change is reported as meaningful at 8 score points, 5 rank places, or any change of research classification. Nothing here is a recommendation to buy or sell.
Plain-English definitions, with the formula and the limitations of each measure.
Fifth research lens · outside the score
Valuation Intelligence
Valuation Intelligence is currently researched separately and does not affect the Suggested Investment Score or daily ranking.
Attractive
66
Attractive
Is this company expensive or inexpensive compared with its own history?
39
Elevated
How expensive is this stock compared with similar companies?
63
Attractive
How much financial output does an investor receive relative to the price paid?
100
Very Attractive
Does the company's growth help justify the valuation investors are paying?
ALBEMARLE CORP reads 65 out of 100 on Valuation Intelligence, recorded as Attractive. The stock currently trades below most of its own recent valuation history and above comparable companies. This describes the price being paid relative to the company's financials — it is not a forecast and not a fair value.
Price data through September 11, 2026 · Financial data through the quarter ended June 30, 2026
Stored readings only. The dashed line is this company's own median for the selected measure.
Only one stored valuation reading exists so far, so there is nothing to chart yet. Valuation history builds forward from activation rather than being reconstructed.
Current P/E 61.9x · own median 21.5x · peer median 12.8x
Valuation is inherently uncertain. A stock that appears inexpensive can continue falling, and a stock that appears expensive can continue rising. Valuation Intelligence provides context about the price investors are paying — it does not predict short-term market movements, and it never produces a fair value, a price target or a buy or sell range. Model VALUATION_INTELLIGENCE_V1.
Sixth research lens · outside the score
Capital Returns Intelligence
Capital Returns Intelligence is researched separately and contributes 0% to the Suggested Investment Score, the daily rank or any ranking event.
Moderate Capital Returns
83
Exceptional Capital Returns
Dividend reliability
5
Limited Capital Returns
Do buybacks actually reduce shares?
No net share repurchases are recorded in the stored cash-flow statements.
15
Limited Capital Returns
Is your ownership share protected?
93
Exceptional Capital Returns
Can the cash flow support it?
25
Limited Capital Returns
Cash returned versus company value
ALBEMARLE CORP reads 46 out of 100 on Capital Returns Intelligence (Moderate Capital Returns), reflecting a dividend that has grown about 3.4% a year and a share count rising about 3.0% a year.
No measurable cash was returned to shareholders through dividends or net repurchases in the latest stored statements.
Price data through September 11, 2026 · Financial data through the quarter ended June 30, 2026
Stored readings only. History builds forward from activation rather than being reconstructed.
Only one stored reading exists for this measure so far, so there is nothing to chart yet.
A very high dividend yield may reflect a falling share price or an unsustainable payout. Capital Returns Intelligence emphasizes consistency and sustainability rather than simply rewarding the highest yield.
Announced or gross buyback spending does not always mean shareholders are gaining ownership. Companies can simultaneously issue shares through employee compensation or acquisitions. Suggested Investments therefore considers actual share-count changes alongside repurchase spending.
Capital Returns Intelligence describes how a company returns capital to shareholders. It is not a measure of stock-price performance, it does not predict future returns, and a strong reading is never a recommendation to buy. Dividends and repurchases can be reduced or stopped at any time. Model CAPITAL_RETURNS_INTELLIGENCE_V1, contributing 0% to the Suggested Investment Score.
Stored daily snapshots only
| Today | #664 | Score 24 |
|---|---|---|
| 30 days ago | Not ranked | No stored score |
| 90 days ago | Not ranked | No stored score |
| First suggested | Not yet suggested | |
| Highest rank | #664 | |
In the company’s own words
Our significant manufacturing presence and sales activities in the E.U. and other global regions require significant compliance costs and may result in increases in the costs of raw materials we purchase and the products we sell. Increases in the costs of our products could result in a decrease in their overall demand; additionally, customers may seek products with lower regulatory compliance requirements, which could also result in a decrease in the demand of certain products subject to the REACH regulations.
The U.S. Toxic Substances Control Act ("TSCA") requires chemicals to be assessed against a risk-based safety standard and calls for the elimination of unreasonable risks identified during risk evaluation. This regulation and other pending initiatives at the U.S. state level, as well as initiatives in Canada, Asia and other regions, could potentially require toxicological testing and risk assessments of a wide variety of chemicals, including chemicals used or produced by us. These assessments may result in heightened concerns about the chemicals involved and additional requirements being placed on the production, handling, labeling or use of the subject chemicals. Such concerns and additional requirements could also increase the cost incurred by our customers to use our chemical products and otherwise limit the use of these products, which could lead to a decrease in demand for these products. Such a decrease in demand could have an adverse impact on our business and results of operations.
We could be subject to damages based on claims brought against us by our customers or lose customers as a result of the failure of our products to meet certain quality specifications.
Our products enable important performance attributes of our customers’ products. If a product fails to perform in a manner consistent with quality specifications or has a shorter useful life than guaranteed, a customer of ours could seek the replacement of the product or damages for costs incurred as a result of the product failing to perform as guaranteed. These risks apply to our refinery catalysts in particular because, in certain instances, we sell our refinery catalysts under agreements that contain limited performance and life cycle guarantees. Also, because many of our products are integrated into our customers’ products, we may be requested to participate in, or fund in whole or in part the costs of, a product recall conducted by a customer. For example, some of our businesses supply products to customers in the automotive industry. In the event one of these customers conducts a product recall that it believes is related to one of our products, we may be asked to participate in, or fund in whole or in part, such a recall.
Quoted from the business section of this company’s 10-K filed February 11, 2026. Read the filing
Four distinct intelligence areas
52
Fundamentally Qualified
+5.3 vs Jun 30, 2026
Business Quality qualification score from the locked IA Defensive Research Core. Price Risk stays a separate category and is never blended in.
As of Sep 11, 2026
31
Weak Compounder
No prior period to compare
Durable business economics and reinvestment characteristics. Independent external validation is pending.
As of Sep 11, 2026
90
Accelerating
No prior period to compare
Direction and breadth of change in underlying business fundamentals. Not a price-momentum signal.
As of Sep 11, 2026
25
Bottom range
0 vs Jun 30, 2026
Only 4 tracked managers disclosed a position — treat as limited coverage.
As of Sep 11, 2026
Company intelligence
Each area is measured and reported separately. No combined score exists.
ALB intelligence history from 2023-09-30 to 2026-09-11. Risk Intelligence 51.9 on 2026-09-11, up 5.3 from 46.6 on 2026-06-30. Long-Term Potential 30.7 on 2026-09-11. Fundamental Momentum 90.3 on 2026-09-11. Elite Investor Activity 25 on 2026-09-11, unchanged 0 from 25 on 2026-06-30. Each area is reported separately and is never combined into a single score.
Risk Intelligence 51.9 as of Sep 11, 2026 (+5.3 vs prior period) · Production core
Long-Term Potential 30.7 as of Sep 11, 2026 · Research model
Fundamental Momentum 90.3 as of Sep 11, 2026 · Research model
Elite Investor Activity 25 as of Sep 11, 2026 (0 vs prior period) · Supplemental
Share price
Closing prices adjusted for splits and dividends, through Sep 11, 2026. Past prices do not indicate future results.
Last stored close $117.52 · +59.2% over the selected range · 52 sessions shown
Balanced evidence
Risk and uncertainty
Public filings · descriptive only
Reporting holders
1
New holders
1
Increasing
0
Reducing
0
Exiting
0
Coverage
Excellent
Positive disclosed activity · Report period 2016-12-31 · Public 12/22/2023
| Manager | Change | Portfolio weight | Rank | Disclosed |
|---|
Insufficient high-confidence manager coverage.
Objective stored changes
IA Defensive improved
Business Quality qualification score moved from 19.7 to 46.6.
Elite Investor Consensus weakened
Disclosed agreement among tracked managers moved from 38 to 25 for the reporting period ending 2026-06-30.
Exit Review triggered
Business Quality fell below the Exit Review threshold. Exit Review is a prompt for review, never an automatic sell.
Elite Investor Consensus weakened
Disclosed agreement among tracked managers moved from 63 to 38 for the reporting period ending 2026-03-31.
Elite Investor Consensus strengthened
Disclosed agreement among tracked managers moved from 33 to 63 for the reporting period ending 2025-12-31.
Elite Investor Consensus weakened
Disclosed agreement among tracked managers moved from 50 to 33 for the reporting period ending 2025-09-30.
Elite Investor Consensus strengthened
Disclosed agreement among tracked managers moved from 33 to 50 for the reporting period ending 2025-06-30.
Elite Investor Consensus weakened
Disclosed agreement among tracked managers moved from 50 to 33 for the reporting period ending 2025-03-31.
Elite Investor Consensus weakened
Disclosed agreement among tracked managers moved from 100 to 50 for the reporting period ending 2024-12-31.
Tracked managers initiated positions
4 tracked managers first disclosed a position for the reporting period ending 2024-09-30.
No high-confidence public ownership events are available.
General research only. Not personalized advice. Public filings may be delayed, amended, incomplete, or reflect positions that have changed since the reporting date.